PG&E Atlantic-Del Mar Reinforcement Project

APPENDICES

A.  PG&E’s Alternatives Comparison

B.  PG&E’s Agency Consultation

C.  Emission Estimates Associated with Underground Power Line Construction

D.  Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Distribution List

LIST OF TABLES

Table B-1.  Project Area Land Use Designations and Existing Land Use

B-4

Table B-2.  Major Equipment to be Used During Construction

B-9

Table B-3.  Estimated Project Construction Schedule

B-10

Table B-4.  Typical Electric Field Values for Appliances, at 12 Inches

B-11

Table B-5.  Magnetic Field From Household Appliances

B-11

Table B-6.  EMF Regulated Limits (by State)

B-13

Table B-7.  Applicant Proposed Measures

B-16

Table B-8.  Agencies Other Than CPUC Whose Approval May Be Required

B-25

Table I-1.  General Guidance for Determination of Impact Significance

B-31

Table I-2.  Summary of Visual Analysis

see note*

Table III-1.  National and State Air Quality Standards

B-69

Table III-2.  Placer County Attainment Status

B-69

Table III-3.  Air Quality Summary

B-69

Table III-4.  Construction Emission Estimates

B-70

Table III-5.  PCAPCD Mitigation Measures No. 1 through 6

B-71

Table III-6.  Emission Estimates Associated With Underground Power Line Construction

B-72

Table IV-1.  Potential Special-Status Plant Species in Project Area

B-75

Table IV-2.  Potential Special Status Wildlife Species in Project Area

B-76

Table IV-3.  Breeding-Season Buffer Zones

B-77

Table IV-4.  Potential Wetlands, Other Waters of the U.S., and Special-Status Species Habitat

B-91

Table VII-1.  Potentially Contaminated Sites in the Project Area

B-102

Table X1-1.  Noise Survey Results (dBA)

B-121

Table XI-2.  City of Rocklin Normally Acceptable Ldn or CNEL Noise Limits

B-121

Table XI-3.  Human Annoyance Vibration Criteria

B-122

Table XI-4.  Vibration Criteria for Potential Building Damage

B-122

Table XI-5.  Typical Noise Levels of Construction Equipment

B-122

Table XII-1.  Population Totals

B-125

Table XII-2.  2000 Total Housing Units and Vacancy Rates

B-125

Table XV-1.  Average Daily Traffic Volumes

B-132

Table XVIII-1.  Initial Study Preparers

B-139

Table C-1.  Mitigation Implementation and Monitoring Plan

C-2

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure B-1.  Regional Location Map

B-2

Figure B-2.  Project Route and New Tubular Steel Pole Locations

B-3

Figure B-3.  Examples of Single and Double Circuit Tubular Steel Pole Structures

B-6

Figure I-1.  Photographic Viewpoint Map

B-37

Figure I-2a.  Key Viewpoint 1 The Preserve Existing View

B-39

Figure I-2b.  Key Viewpoint 1 The Preserve Visual Simulation

B-41

Figure I-3a.  Key Viewpoint 2 North of Sunset Blvd. Existing View

B-43

Figure I-3b.  Key Viewpoint 2 North of Sunset Blvd. Visual Simulation

B-45

Figure I-4a.  Key Viewpoint 3 Front Street Existing View

B-47

Figure I-4b.  Key Viewpoint 3 Front Street Visual Simulation

B-49

Figure I-5a.  Key Viewpoint 4 Railroad Avenue - South Existing View

B-51

Figure I-5b.  Key Viewpoint 4 Railroad Avenue - South Visual Simulation

B-53

Figure I-6a.  Key Viewpoint 5 Railroad Avenue - North Existing View

B-55

Figure I-6b.  Key Viewpoint 5 Railroad Avenue - North Visual Simulation

B-57

Figure I-6c.  Key Viewpoint 5 Transition Structure Visual Simulation

B-59

Figure I-7a.  Key Viewpoint 6 Midas Avenue Existing View

Figure I-7b.  Key Viewpoint 6 Midas Avenue Visual Simulation

B-63

Figure IV-1a.  Potential Wetlands, Other Waters of the U.S., and Special-Status Invertebrate Habitat between Mileposts 1.9 and 3.1

see note*

Figure IV-1b.  Potential Wetlands, Other Waters of the U.S., and Special-Status Invertebrate Habitat between Mileposts 1.9 and 3.1

see note*

Figure IV-1c.  Potential Wetlands, Other Waters of the U.S., and Special-Status Invertebrate Habitat between Mileposts 1.9 and 3.1

see note*

Figure VII-1.  Hazardous Materials Spill Sites

B-103

Figure VIII-1.  FEMA 100- and 500-Year Floodplain Zones

B-111

Figure XV-1.  Circulation Map

B-131

Appendix A Figure A-1.  Preliminary Alternatives Considered

see note*