STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

 

Southern California Edison's

El Casco System Project

 

 

 


 

 

 

Recirculated Draft

Environmental Impact Report

 

 

 

 


These files are in Portable Document Format (PDF). To view them, you will need to download the free Adobe Acrobat Reader if it is not already installed on your PC. Note: For faster results in displaying the largest files (see sizes shown in parentheses below for files over 3.0 MB), right-click the file's link, click "Save Target As" ("Save Link As" in Netscape) to download the file to your hard drive, then double-click the downloaded file.

 

Notice of Availability

 

1

 

Recirculated Draft EIR Cover

 

1

 

Title Page

 

1

 

Executive Summary

 

ES.1. Introduction/Background
ES.2. Alternatives
ES.3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures - Noise
ES.4. Summary Comparison of the Proposed Project and Alternatives

ES.5. Impact Summary Tables
Figure ES-1. Electrical Needs Area
Figure ES-2. Regional Overview of El Casco System Project

 

1

 

A.

Introduction/Overview

 

 

A.1. Legal Authority

A.2. Purpose of Recirculation  

A.3. Overview of the Environmental Review Process               

A.4. Project Details  

A.5. Readers Guide

 

1

 

D.

Environmental Analysis

 

1

 

D.9

Noise

 

D.9.1. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project

D.9.2. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards

D.9.3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed Project

D.9.4. CPUC’s Northerly Route Alternative Option 3

D.9.5. Partial Underground Alternative

D.9.6. No Project Alternative

D.9.7. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table

D.9.8. Cumulative Impact Analysis - Noise

D.9.9. References

Figure D.9-1. Typical Range of Common Sounds Heard in the Environment

Figure D.9-2. Outdoor Day/Night Sound Levels in Different Areas

Figure D.9-3. Comparison of Audible Corona Noise Levels (imbedded in text)

 

 

E.

Comparison of Alternatives

 

E.1. Comparison Methodology

E.2. Environmentally Superior Alternative

E.3. No Project Alternative vs. the Environmentally Superior Alternative

 

This page contains tables and is best viewed with Netscape or Internet Explorer. Please report any problems to the Energy Division web coordinator.