Class I Impacts: Significant, Cannot Be Mitigated To A Level That Is Not Significant
Issue Area/Project or Alternative/Impact Description |
Phase |
Mitigation Measure |
AIR QUALITY |
||
PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES | ||
|
|
|
Oil Spill causes release of hydrocarbons, which could result in exceeding the CAAQS or NAAQS for ozone. | A |
None Available |
Ignition of a spill could result in a short term violation of the 24-hour particulate CAAQS. | A |
None Available |
Cumulative project could further exacerbate the potential short-term Class I NOX and PM10 impacts estimated for the proposed pipeline construction. | A |
None Available |
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES |
||
PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALONDRA ALTERNATIVE | ||
A pipeline spill could impact sensitive species at the river mouths or in the harbor. | A |
B-7 SFPPs Spill Response Plan shall be expanded or modified to include a list of sensitive biological habitats at the Los Angeles and San Gabriel River mouths. |
A major earthquake resulting in multiple pipeline ruptures, could cause significant impacts to occur to downstream species and habitats. | A |
None Available |
NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE | ||
Increased throughput has the potential for increasing the size and frequency of pipeline spills | A |
None Available |
Truck accidents have the potential for contamination of surface waters | A |
None Available |
CULTURAL RESOURCES |
||
None |
||
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION |
||
None |
||
GEOLOGY AND SOILS |
||
PROPOSED PROJECT AND SANTA FE ALTERNATIVE | ||
Potential rupture of the pipeline in the Newport-Inglewood fault zone. | O |
G-1 SFPP shall prepare a fault investigation to define the location, orientation and direction of anticipated offset for the Newport-Inglewood fault and develop site-specific mitigation for the fault crossing. |
HYDROLOGY |
||
PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES | ||
Contamination of groundwater resulting from pipeline leak or rupture; potential contamination of water wells. | A |
H-2 SFPP shall ensure that the pipeline is located at least 200 feet from any existing water well and/or a greater separation or special pipeline design features (e.g., concrete coating to further protect against third-party damage) may be required. |
Contamination of Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers and Compton Creek, and downstream areas and harbors with petroleum products, would result from a pipeline rupture in or above the waterway (spilling either directly into the waterway or via storm drains). | A |
See Mitigation Measure B-1 |
NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE | ||
Increased pipeline throughput has the potential for increasing the size and frequency of pipeline spills; increased trucking leads to greater accidents with potential to contaminate waterways. | A |
None Available |
LAND USE AND PUBLIC RECREATION |
||
PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES | ||
Pipeline accidents (spills, leaks, fire, explosion) could contaminate land/water or cause injuries/death | A |
L-6 Include specific spill/fire emergency response procedures for sensitive land uses in Oil Spill Contingency Plan (OSCP) to further reduce potential land use impacts. |
NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE | ||
Increased demand would result in more truck trips. Spills from truck accidents would have the potential to cause significant unavoidable impacts on adjacent land uses. | A |
None Available |
NOISE |
||
None |
||
SOCIOECONOMICS, PUBLIC SERVICES, AND UTILITIES |
||
PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES | ||
Cumulative socioeconomic impacts of a spill from petroleum products transport (via pipeline or trucks) in the study area, and the potential for co-located ruptures of other oil, gas, chemical, and/or product pipelines would be significant. | A |
None Available |
Potential consequences of a co-location accident that disrupts utility services. | A |
S-4 SFPP shall set priorities for disaster repair efforts on utility lines and transportation networks, subject to approval by the affected Offices of Emergency Services. |
SYSTEM SAFETY AND RISK OF UPSET |
||
PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES | ||
Oil spill could cause environmental damage or injury | A |
SS-6 SFPP shall develop
and implement a program for routine inspection of
mainline valves every six months. The valves shall be
checked for mechanical integrity. Remotely activated
block valves shall be checked to ensure they function
automatically and properly within 60 seconds. SS-7 SFPP shall enhance the existing safety and monitoring systems at all affected pump stations (Watson, Norwalk, City of Industry and Colton) to ensure safety of operations SS-8 SFPP shall install flammable/combustible hydrocarbon detectors at each valve box location. SS-9 SFPP shall install at least two flammable/combustible hydrocarbon detectors at each remotely operated pump, with a voting system. If two detectors alarm at the same time, the pump shutdown shall occur. SS-10 SFPP shall install state of-the-art SCADA system SS-16 The Applicant shall develop and maintain an up-to-date OSCP in compliance with 49 CFR 195.402; see text for full details on requirements to protect sensitive resources and to upgrade emergency response capabilities. SS-17 Copies of the approved OSCP must be distributed to all fire departments whose jurisdictions are crossed by the pipeline route and local fire departments who may be called on for emergency response. Copies of all updates must also be provided. SS-18 Oil spill containment and response equipment shall be supplied and maintained by the Applicant at locations accessible to first response personnel along the route to facilitate rapid response to an oil spill. SS-19 A public education program shall be conducted consistent with 49 CFR 195.440, under the supervision of the California State Fire Marshal, to help the public and agencies understand pipeline safety hazards. A Web Site shall be established. SS-20 Conduct comprehensive safety and reliability analysis of the SCADA system and pipeline control room, utilizing guidelines developed by the Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers. |
Pipeline corrosion could cause pipeline leaking or rupture and result in oil spill | A |
SS-11 Implement internal
corrosion techniques in accordance with the requirements
of the California State Fire Marshal (49CFR195.418),
including a continuous corrosion inhibitor program. SS-12 Coat the pipeline to reduce the potential for external corrosion. The performance of the proposed coating (Pritec or Synergy brand Polyethylene type) must be documented (to the satisfaction of the California State Fire Marshal). |
Aging pipeline is more likely to rupture and cause oil spill | A |
SS-13 After every 20 years of operation, the Applicant should conduct a full analysis of the pipeline components for safety and reliability purposes. |
Ground acceleration resulting from earthquakes could interfere with effective communication | A |
SS-15 Install even speed and vibration sensors at all pump stations to shut down the pipeline automatically in the event that threshold acceleration is exceeded. |
Fire could damage pump stations | A |
SS-21 Aqueous
film-forming fire fighting equipment shall be maintained
at each of the pipeline pump stations (excluding the
originating and receiving stations) SS-22 Prepare a Fire Protection Plan for the operational phase of the Proposed Project. The Plan shall include details of fire protection and loss prevention measures that will be implemented during the operation of the pipeline. The Plan shall be approved by the local fire jurisdiction. |
TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC | ||
None | ||
VISUAL RESOURCES | ||
None |