Previous Rule Change

Main Page

Resolution & Decision Main Page

Change List for this Rule

Search Decision Number 18-05-042

Decision Number 18-05-042

Next Rule Change

 

Original Version

Rule 18

 

18      Reporting and Resolution of Safety Hazards Discovered by Utilities

 

            For purposes of this rule, “Safety Hazard” means a condition that poses a significant threat to human life or property.

 

A.   Resolution of Safety Hazards And General Order 95 Nonconformances

(1)        a) Each company (including utilities and CIPs) is responsible for taking appropriate corrective action to remedy Safety Hazards and GO 95 nonconformances posed by its facilities.

 

b) Upon completion of the corrective action, the company’s records shall show, with sufficient detail, the nature of the work, the date, and the identity of persons performing the work. These records shall be preserved by the company for at least ten (10) years and shall be made available to Commission staff upon 30 days notice.

 

c) Where a communications company’s or an electric utility’s actions result in GO nonconformances for another entity, that entity’s remedial action will be to transmit a single documented notice of identified nonconformances to the communications company or electric utility for compliance.

 

(2)        a)  All companies shall establish an auditable maintenance program for their facilities and lines. All companies must include a timeline for corrective actions to be taken following the identification of a Safety Hazard or nonconformances with General Order 95 on the company’s facilities.

 

The auditable maintenance program shall prioritize corrective actions consistent with the priority levels set forth below and based on the following factors, as appropriate:

 

·       Safety and reliability as specified in the priority levels below;

·       Type of facility or equipment;

·       Location, including whether the Safety Hazard or nonconformance is located in the High Fire-Threat District;

·       Accessibility;

·       Climate;

·       Direct or potential impact on operations, customers, electrical company workers, communications workers, and the general public.

 

There shall be 3 priority levels.

 

(i)          Level 1:

·       Immediate safety and/or reliability risk with high probability for significant impact.

·       Take action immediately, either by fully repairing the condition, or by temporarily repairing and reclassifying the condition to a lower priority.

(ii)         Level 2:

·       Variable (non-immediate high to low) safety and/or reliability risk.

·       Take action to correct within specified time period (fully repair, or by temporarily repairing and reclassifying the condition to a lower priority).

 

Time period for correction to be determined at the time of identification by a qualified company representative, but not to exceed: (1) six months for nonconformances that create a fire risk located in Tier 3 of the High Fire-Threat District; (2) 12 months for nonconformances that create a fire risk located in Tier 2 of the High Fire-Threat District; (3) 12 months for nonconformances that compromise worker safety; and (4) 59 months for all other Level 2 nonconformances.

(iii)        Level 3:

·       Acceptable safety and/or reliability risk.

·       Take action (re-inspect, re-evaluate, or repair) as appropriate.

 

b)  Correction times may be extended under reasonable circumstances, such as:

·       Third party refusal

·       Customer issue

·       No access

·       Permits required

·       System emergencies (e.g. fires, severe weather conditions)

(3)        Companies that have existing General Order 165 auditable inspection and maintenance programs that are consistent with the purpose of Rule 18A shall continue to follow their General Order 165 programs.

 

B.   Notification of Safety Hazards

 

If a company, while performing inspections of its facilities, discovers a safety hazard(s) on or near a communications facility or electric facility involving another company, the inspecting company shall notify the other company and/or facility owner of such safety hazard(s) no later than 10 business days after the discovery. To the extent the inspecting company cannot determine the facility owner/operator, it shall contact the pole owner(s), who shall be responsible for promptly notifying the company owning/operating the facility with the safety hazard(s), normally not to exceed five business days after being notified of the safety hazard. The notification shall be documented and such documentation must be preserved by all parties for at least ten years.

 

Note: Each pole owner must be able to determine all other pole owners on poles it owns. Each pole owner must be able to determine all authorized entities that attach equipment on its portion of a pole.

 

 

Strikeout and Underline Version

Rule 18

 

18   Reporting and Resolution of Safety Hazards Discovered by Utilities Maintenance Programs and Resolution of Potential Violations of General Order 95 and Safety Hazards

For purposes of this rule, “Safety Hazard” means a condition that poses a significant threat to human life or property.

A   Resolution of Potential Violations of General Order 95 and Safety Hazards and General Order 95 Nonconformances

(1)(a)  Each company (including electric utilities and CIPs communications companies) is responsible for taking appropriate corrective action to remedy potential violations of GO 95 and Safety Hazards and GO 95 nonconformances posed by its facilities.

(b)  Upon completion of the corrective action, the company’s records shall show, with sufficient detail, the nature of the work, the date, and the identity of persons performing the work.  These records shall be preserved by the company for at least ten (10) years and shall be made available to Commission staff upon 30 days notice.

(2)(c)   Where a communications company’s or an electric utility’s (Company A’s) actions result in potential violations of GO 95 nonconformances for another entity (Company B), that entity’s (Company B’s) remedial action will be to transmit a single documented notice of identified nonconformances potential violations to the communications company or electric utility (Company A) for compliance within a reasonable amount of time not to exceed 180 days after the entity discovers the potential violations of GO 95.  If the potential violation constitutes a Safety Hazard, such notice shall be transmitted within ten (10) business days after the entity discovers the Safety Hazard.

(3)       If a company, while performing inspections of its facilities, discovers a Safety Hazard(s) on or near a communications facility or electric facility involving another company, the inspecting company shall notify the other entity of such Safety Hazard(s) no later than ten (10) business days after the discovery.

(4)       To the extent a company that has a notification requirement under (2) or (3) above cannot determine the facility owner/operator, it shall contact the pole owner(s) within ten (10) business days if the subject of the notification is a Safety Hazard, or otherwise within a reasonable amount of time not to exceed 180 days after discovery.  The notified pole owner(s) shall be responsible for promptly (normally not to exceed five business days) notifying the company owning/operating the facility if the subject of the notification is a Safety Hazard, or otherwise within a reasonable amount of time not to exceed 180 days, after being notified of the potential violation of GO 95.

(5)       A company receiving a notification under (2), (3), or (4) above shall take appropriate corrective action consistent with the provisions of this rule.  For at least ten (10) years, the documentation of the notice shall be maintained by both the notifying and receiving parties and documentation of the correction shall be maintained by the receiving party.

Note:  Each pole owner must be able to determine all other pole owners on poles it owns.  Each pole owner must be able to determine all authorized entities that attach equipment on its portion of a pole.

 

B   Maintenance Programs

(2)(a)  All companies Each company (including electric utilities and communications companies) shall establish and implement an auditable maintenance program for their its facilities and lines for the purpose of ensuring that they are in good condition so as to conform to these rules.  Each company must describe in its auditable maintenance program the required qualifications for the company representatives who perform inspections and/or who schedule corrective actions.  Companies that are subject to GO 165 may maintain procedures for conducting inspections and maintenance activities in compliance with this rule and with GO 165.

All companies The auditable maintenance program must include, at a minimum, records that show the date of the inspection, type of equipment/facility inspected, findings, and a timeline for corrective actions to be taken following the identification of a potential violation of GO 95 or a Safety Hazard or nonconformances with General Order 95 on the company’s facilities.

(1)       The auditable maintenance program Companies shall prioritize undertake corrective actions consistent with within the time periods stated for each of the priority levels set forth below.  Scheduling of corrective actions within the time periods below may be and based on additional factors, including the following factors, as appropriate:

·       Safety and reliability as specified in the priority levels below;

·       Type of facility or equipment;

·       Location, including whether the Safety Hazard or nonconformance potential violation is located in the High Fire-Threat District;

·       Accessibility;

·       Climate;

·       Direct or potential impact on operations, customers, electrical company workers, communications workers, and the general public.

 

There shall be 3 priority levels. 

(a)(i) The maximum time periods for corrective actions associated with potential violation of GO 95 or a Safety Hazard are based on the following priority levels:

(i)     Level 1 -- An immediate risk of high potential impact to safety or reliability:

·       Immediate safety and/or reliability risk with high probability for significant impact.

·       Take corrective action immediately, either by fully repairing the condition, or by temporarily repairing and reclassifying the condition to a lower priority.

(ii)     Level 2 -- Any other risk of at least moderate potential impact to safety or reliability:

·       Variable (non-immediate high to low) safety and/or reliability risk.

·       Take corrective action to correct within specified time period (either by fully repairing, or by temporarily repairing and reclassifying the condition to a lower Level 3 priority).  Time period for correction corrective action to be determined at the time of identification by a qualified company representative, but not to exceed: (1) six months for nonconformances potential violations that create a fire risk located in Tier 3 of the High Fire-Threat District; (2) 12 months for nonconformances potential violations that create a fire risk located in Tier 2 of the High Fire-Threat District; (3) 12 months for nonconformances potential violations that compromise worker safety; and (4) 59 36 months for all other Level 2 nonconformances potential violations.

(iii)    Level 3 -- Any risk of low potential impact to safety or reliability:

·       Acceptable safety and/or reliability risk.

·       Take corrective action (re-inspect, re-evaluate, or repair) as appropriate within 60 months subject to the exception specified below.

EXCEPTION – Potential violations specified in Appendix J or subsequently approved through Commission processes, including, but not limited to, a Tier 2 Advice Letter under GO 96B, that can be completed at a future time as opportunity-based maintenance.

Where an exception has been granted, repair of a potential violation must be completed the next time the company’s crew is at the structure to perform tasks at the same or higher work level, i.e., the public, communications, or electric level.  The condition’s record in the auditable maintenance program must indicate the relevant exception and the date of the corrective action.

Note:  Appendix I contains illustrative examples of potential violations of GO 95 and Safety Hazards, and their priority levels used to determine the maximum time period for corrective action.

 

(b)  Correction times may be extended under reasonable circumstances, such as:

·          Third party refusal

·          Customer issue

·          No access

·          Permits required

·          System emergencies (e.g. fires, severe weather conditions)

(2)       Commission staff may direct a company to correct violation(s) of GO 95 at specific location(s) sooner than the maximum time periods contained in this rule.

(3)       Companies that have existing General Order 165 auditable inspection and maintenance programs that are consistent with the purpose of Rule 18A shall continue to follow their General Order 165 programs.

 

B.  Notification of Safety Hazards

If a company, while performing inspections of its facilities, discovers a safety hazard(s) on or near a communications facility or electric facility involving another company, the inspecting company shall notify the other company and/or facility owner of such safety hazard(s) no later than 10 business days after the discovery.  To the extent the inspecting company cannot determine the facility owner/operator, it shall contact the pole owner(s), who shall be responsible for promptly notifying the company owning/operating the facility with the safety hazard(s), normally not to exceed five business days after being notified of the safety hazard.  The notification shall be documented and such documentation must be preserved by all parties for at least ten years.

 

Note:  Each pole owner must be able to determine all other pole owners on poles it owns.  Each pole owner must be able to determine all authorized entities that attach equipment on its portion of a pole.

Note:  Added August 20, 2009 by Decision No. 09-08-029.  Revised January 12, 2012 by Decision No. 1201032.

 

 

 

 

 

Final Version

Rule 18

 

18   Maintenance Programs and Resolution of Potential Violations of General Order 95 and Safety Hazards

For purposes of this rule, “Safety Hazard” means a condition that poses a significant threat to human life or property.

A   Resolution of Potential Violations of General Order 95 and Safety Hazards

(1)  Each company (including electric utilities and communications companies) is responsible for taking appropriate corrective action to remedy potential violations of GO 95 and Safety Hazards posed by its facilities.

Upon completion of the corrective action, the company’s records shall show, with sufficient detail, the nature of the work, the date, and the identity of persons performing the work.  These records shall be preserved by the company for at least ten (10) years.

(2)  Where a communications company’s or an electric utility’s (Company A’s) actions result in potential violations of GO 95 for another entity (Company B), that entity’s (Company B’s) remedial action will be to transmit a single documented notice of identified potential violations to the communications company or electric utility (Company A) within a reasonable amount of time not to exceed 180 days after the entity discovers the potential violations of GO 95.  If the potential violation constitutes a Safety Hazard, such notice shall be transmitted within ten (10) business days after the entity discovers the Safety Hazard.

(3)  If a company, while performing inspections of its facilities, discovers a Safety Hazard(s) on or near a communications facility or electric facility involving another company, the inspecting company shall notify the other entity of such Safety Hazard(s) no later than ten (10) business days after the discovery.

(4)  To the extent a company that has a notification requirement under (2) or (3) above cannot determine the facility owner/operator, it shall contact the pole owner(s) within ten (10) business days if the subject of the notification is a Safety Hazard, or otherwise within a reasonable amount of time not to exceed 180 days after discovery.  The notified pole owner(s) shall be responsible for promptly (normally not to exceed five business days) notifying the company owning/operating the facility if the subject of the notification is a Safety Hazard, or otherwise within a reasonable amount of time not to exceed 180 days, after being notified of the potential violation of GO 95.

(5)  A company receiving a notification under (2), (3), or (4) above shall take appropriate corrective action consistent with the provisions of this rule.  For at least ten (10) years, the documentation of the notice shall be maintained by both the notifying and receiving parties and documentation of the correction shall be maintained by the receiving party.

Note:  Each pole owner must be able to determine all other pole owners on poles it owns.  Each pole owner must be able to determine all authorized entities that attach equipment on its portion of a pole.

 

 

B   Maintenance Programs

Each company (including electric utilities and communications companies) shall establish and implement an auditable maintenance program for its facilities and lines for the purpose of ensuring that they are in good condition so as to conform to these rules.  Each company must describe in its auditable maintenance program the required qualifications for the company representatives who perform inspections and/or who schedule corrective actions.  Companies that are subject to GO 165 may maintain procedures for conducting inspections and maintenance activities in compliance with this rule and with GO 165.

The auditable maintenance program must include, at a minimum, records that show the date of the inspection, type of equipment/facility inspected, findings, and a timeline for corrective actions to be taken following the identification of a potential violation of GO 95 or a Safety Hazard on the company’s facilities.

(1) Companies shall undertake corrective actions within the time periods stated for each of the priority levels set forth below.  Scheduling of corrective actions within the time periods below may be based on additional factors, including the following factors, as appropriate:

·       Type of facility or equipment;

·       Location, including whether the Safety Hazard or potential violation is located in the High Fire-Threat District;

·       Accessibility;

·       Climate;

·       Direct or potential impact on operations, customers, electrical company workers, communications workers, and the general public.

(a) The maximum time periods for corrective actions associated with potential violation of GO 95 or a Safety Hazard are based on the following priority levels:

(i)    Level 1 -- An immediate risk of high potential impact to safety or reliability:

·       Take corrective action immediately, either by fully repairing or by temporarily repairing and reclassifying to a lower priority.

(ii)   Level 2 -- Any other risk of at least moderate potential impact to safety or reliability:

·       Take corrective action within specified time period (either by fully repair or by temporarily repairing and reclassifying to Level 3 priority).  Time period for corrective action to be determined at the time of identification by a qualified company representative, but not to exceed: (1) six months for potential violations that create a fire risk located in Tier 3 of the High Fire-Threat District; (2) 12 months for potential violations that create a fire risk located in Tier 2 of the High Fire-Threat District; (3) 12 months for potential violations that compromise worker safety; and (4) 36 months for all other Level 2 potential violations.

(iii)   Level 3 -- Any risk of low potential impact to safety or reliability:

·       Take corrective action within 60 months subject to the exception specified below.

EXCEPTION – Potential violations specified in Appendix J or subsequently approved through Commission processes, including, but not limited to, a Tier 2 Advice Letter under GO 96B, that can be completed at a future time as opportunity-based maintenance.

Where an exception has been granted, repair of a potential violation must be completed the next time the company’s crew is at the structure to perform tasks at the same or higher work level, i.e., the public, communications, or electric level.  The condition’s record in the auditable maintenance program must indicate the relevant exception and the date of the corrective action.

Note:  Appendix I contains illustrative examples of potential violations of GO 95 and Safety Hazards, and their priority levels used to determine the maximum time period for corrective action.

(b) Correction times may be extended under reasonable circumstances, such as:

·          Third party refusal

·          Customer issue

·          No access

·          Permits required

·          System emergencies (e.g. fires, severe weather conditions)

(2)      Commission staff may direct a company to correct violation(s) of GO 95 at specific location(s) sooner than the maximum time periods contained in this rule.