Notice of Availability
VOLUME I
Title
Page
|
|
Executive
Summary |
ES.1. Introduction/Background |
ES.2. Alternatives |
ES.3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation
Measures |
ES.4. Summary Comparison of the Proposed
Project and Alternatives |
ES.5. Impact Summary Tables |
ES.6. References |
Fig.
ES-1. Regional Project Location |
Fig.
ES-2. Proposed Project |
Fig.
ES-3. Diablo Canyon Power Plant |
Fig.
ES-4. Proposed Project Alternatives |
|
A.
Introduction |
A.1. Overview and History of DCPP |
A.2. Purpose and Need |
A.3. Coordination of Industry Resources |
A.4. Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
A.5. CPUC Jurisdiction |
A.6. Agency Use of this Document |
A.7. Reader's Guide to This EIR |
A.8. References |
Fig.
A-1. Typical Nuclear Power Plant Steam Supply System |
Fig. A-2. Steam Generator Tube Degradation
Mechanisms (figure embedded in text) |
|
B.
Project Description |
B.1. Overview of Proposed Project |
B.2. Project Background |
B.3. Project Components |
B.4. Project Schedule, Equipment and
Personnel Requirements |
B.5. Decommissioning |
B.6. Project Description Measures or
Activities to Prevent Environmental Impacts |
B.7. References |
Fig.
B-1. Regional Project Location |
Fig.
B-2. Proposed Project |
Fig.
B-3. Diablo Canyon Power Plant |
Fig. B-4. Steam Generator - Dimensions
and Operating Parameters (figure embedded in text) |
Fig.
B-5. Port San Luis |
Fig. B-6. Barge Route through Moorings
into Port San Luis (figure embedded in text) |
Fig.
B-7. Photos of Steam Generator Barges |
Fig. B-8. Plan View of "Live Offload"
Barge Docking at Port San Luis (figure embedded
in text) |
Fig. B-9. Barge and Ground Transporter
Drawing (figure embedded in text) |
Fig.
B-10. Photos of Steam Generator Offloading |
Fig.
B-11. Port San Luis Area |
Fig. B-12. Steam Generator on Runway
Moving through the Equipment Hatch from the Containment Structure
onto the Auxiliary Building Roof (figure embedded
in text) |
Fig. B-13. Steam Generator Lifted from
Place and onto the Runway Moving through the Equipment Hatch from
the Containment Structure onto the Auxiliary Building Roof (figure
embedded in text) |
Fig. B-14. Steam Generator Passing over
the Auxiliary Building (figure embedded in text) |
Fig. B-15. Steam Generator Lowered onto
the Transporter Outside of the Auxiliary Building (figure
embedded in text) |
Fig. B-16. Additional Workforce during
Proposed Project (figure embedded in text) |
|
C.
Alternatives |
C.1. Applicant Proposed Options |
C.2. Alternatives Development and Screening
Process |
C.3. Alternatives Screening Methodology |
C.4. Alternatives Evaluated in this
EIR |
C.5. Alternatives Evaluated and Eliminated |
C.6. No Project Alternative |
C.7. References |
Fig.
C-1. Proposed Project Alternatives |
Fig.
C-2. Potential Alternatives in the Port San Luis Vicinity |
Fig.
C-3. Potential Alternatives from Port San Luis to DCPP Facility |
Fig.
C-4. Potential Alternatives in the DCPP Vicinity |
Fig.
C-5. Potential Alternatives Northwest of DCPP Facility |
Fig.
C-6. Natural Gas Pipeline Infrastructure in California |
Fig.
C-7. Transmission Infrastructure in California |
|
D.1.
Introduction to Environmental Analysis |
|
D.2.
Air Quality |
|
D.3.
Biological Resources |
Fig.
D.3-1. Native and Introduced Vegetation Adjacent to the
RSG Offloading Alternative and Transport Route |
|
D.4.
Cultural Resources |
Fig.
D.4-1. Area of Potential Effects (APE) |
|
D.5.
Geology, Soils, and Paleontology |
Fig.
D.5-1. View of Hill 914 and Green Peak |
Fig.
D.5-2. Geologic Formations and Mapped Landslide Areas |
Fig.
D.5.3. Example of Rockfall near Atascadero |
Fig.
D.5.4. Example of Rockfall near Santa Rita |
|
D.6.
Hazardous Materials |
|
D.7.
Hydrology and Water Quality |
Fig.
D.7-1. Drainageway Crossings Along RSG Transport Route |
|
D.8.
Land Use, Recreation, and Agriculture |
Fig.
D.8-1. Diablo Canyon Power Plant Property Map |
Fig.
D.8-2. Land Use, Recreation, and Agriculture Study Area |
Fig.
D.8-3. Land Use Designations |
Fig.
D.8-4. Recreational Facilities |
Fig.
D.8-5. Important Farmland |
Fig.
D.8-6. Williamson Act Lands |
|
D.9.
Noise and Vibration |
Fig. D.9-1. Typical Range of Common
Sounds Heard in the Environment (figure embedded
in text) |
|
D.10.
Public Services and Utilities |
|
D.11.
Socioeconomics |
|
D.12.
System and Transportation Safety |
Fig.
D.12-1. DCPP Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) Map |
Fig. D.12-2. Sources of Radiation Exposure
(figure embedded in text) |
Fig. D.12-3. Barge Transport in Port
San Luis (figure embedded in text) |
|
D.13.
Traffic and Circulation |
Fig.
D.13-1. Project Area Roadway System |
|
D.14.
Visual Resources |
Fig.
D.14-1. Project Viewshed: Seen Areas, Landscape Units, and
KOPs |
Fig.
D.14-2. San Luis Obispo Bay, Offloading Location, and Harford
Pier and Landing |
Fig.
D.14-3. Coastal Hills |
Fig.
D.14-4. Diablo Canyon Power Plant |
Fig.
D.14-5. Open Water Viewpoints |
|
E.
Comparison of Alternatives |
E.1. Comparison Methodology |
E.2. Environmentally Superior Alternative |
E.3. No Project Alternative vs. the
Environmentally Superior Alternative |
|
F.
Other CEQA Considerations |
F.1. Growth Inducing Effects |
F.2. Significant Irreversible Changes |
F.3. Cumulative Scenario |
F.4. Cumulative Impact Analysis |
F.5. References |
|
G.
NRC License Renewal |
G.1. PG&E's Position on NRC License
Renewal |
G.2. NRC Licensing Process |
G.3. Status of License Renewal Applications |
G.4. Issues Relevant to DCPP License
Renewal |
G.5. References |
|
H.
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting |
H.1. Introduction to MMCRP |
H.2. Roles and Responsibilities |
H.3. General Monitoring Procedures |
H.4. Mitigation Compliance Plan |
H.5. Condition Effectiveness Review |
H.6. Mitigation Monitoring Program Tables |
|
I.
Public Participation |
I.1. EIR Scoping Process |
I.2. Public Notification |
I.3. Final EIR Release |
|
J.
Report Preparation |
J.1. EIR Preparers |
J.2. EIR Information Contacts |
J.3. List of Definitions and Acronyms |
|
Appendices |
Appendix 1. Notice
of Preparation |
Appendix
2. Biological Resources |
Appendix
3. Summary of Pertinent Federal Regulations |
|
VOLUME II
Title Page |
|
Introduction
to Volume II |
Table 1. Commenters and Comment Set Numbers |
Master Responses to Major Comments |
Master Response MR-1: Baseline |
Master Response MR-2: NRC License Renewal |
Master Response MR-3: NRC vs. CPUC Jurisdiction |
Master Response MR-4: RWQCB Consent Judgment |
|
Comments and Responses to Comments |
Comments Received from
Public Agencies |
Comment Set A - Port San Luis Harbor District
Comment Set B - CDF/San Luis Obispo County Fire Department
Comment Set C - San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning &
Building |
|
Comments Received from
Public Agencies, cont. |
Comment Set D - California State Lands Commission
Comment Set E - California Coastal Commission
Comment Set F - San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District |
|
Comments Received
from Organizations and Companies |
Comment Set CC1 - Arroyo Grande Valley Chamber of Commerce
Comment Set CC2 - Sierra Club
Comment Set CC3 - San Luis Obispo County Green Party
Comment Set CC4 - Avila Valley Advisory Council
Comment Set CC5 - Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility |
|
Comments Received from Organizations and Companies, cont. |
Comment Set CC6 - San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, Sierra Club,
Public Citizen, and Environment California (the "Joint Parties"):
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5 (6.6MB)
Part 6 (responses) |
|
Comments Received from
Organizations and Companies, cont. |
Comment Set CC7 - Southern California Edison Company |
|
Comments Received at Public Workshops |
Comment Set
PM1 - Public Meeting, San Luis Obispo, 5:30 p.m. April 19,
2005 |
Comment Set
PM2 - Public Meeting, San Luis Obispo, 1:00 p.m. April 20,
2005 |
|
Comments Received from Private Individuals |
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3 |
|
Comments Received from the Applicant (PG&E) |
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5 (6.2MB)
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8 (responses) |